Monday, May 7, 2007

Fantastic Article by Eugene Robinson about racism

What Lies Beneath

By Eugene Robinson
Wednesday, November 22, 2006; A21

Anyone who thinks that racism in this country is history really ought to watch the video of Kramer going postal.

I'm not saying that everyone is like Michael Richards, the "Seinfeld" alumnus whose hideous meltdown at a Los Angeles comedy club Friday was captured by a digital camera and soon posted on the Internet for all to witness in slack-jawed amazement. I'm not saying that evil lurks in the hearts of all men and women. But I am saying that, as a society, we still haven't purged ourselves of racial prejudices and animosities. We've buried them under layers of sincere enlightenment and insincere political correctness, but they're still down there, eating at our souls.

For those who missed it, Richards -- who will always be known as Cosmo Kramer, Jerry Seinfeld's indescribably weird neighbor -- was performing at the Laugh Factory, a club in Hollywood, when a heckler in the audience began to intervene. There isn't a comic alive, I would wager, who has never been heckled. Surely, a performer of Richards's experience has faced rowdier interlopers than the one Friday night.

Who happened to be black.

Out of nowhere, Richards explodes. He screams at the man, and I mean screams, "Fifty years ago they'd have you upside down with a [expletive] fork up your ass." Audience members don't initially react, perhaps unsure if they've really just heard a nostalgic reference to lynching.

But Richards continues, at the top of his lungs, using the expletive for which the term "N-word" is far too cute. "He's a [expletive]! He's a [expletive]! He's a [expletive]! A [expletive], look, there's a [expletive]!"

In the background, a female member of the audience is heard to say, "Oh my God."

The rant doesn't end there, but that's the gist of it. The whole thing was captured on a pocket-size digital camera that has the ability to record snippets of video, and the recording surfaced on the Web site TMZ.com.

"Usually, when you see the tape you've been waiting to get your hands on, the reality isn't as big as you think," said TMZ.com managing editor Harvey Levin. "This was bigger."

This is the second big scoop by TMZ.com, a year-old partnership between AOL and Telepictures, a division of Warner Bros. The Web site also was the first news outlet to report on Mel Gibson's drunken, anti-Semitic rant. "What I'm hoping is that we're the go-to place for breaking entertainment stories," Levin said, "not that we're the site that specializes in racist celebrities."

Richards went on David Letterman's show Monday night to apologize. Appearing via satellite feed from Los Angeles, Richards gave a rambling mea culpa that provided few answers. He made no excuses for his inexcusable words, but he did tell viewers, "I'm not a racist."

He could have fooled me. Just as Gibson, who in his own ritual abject apology said he's not an anti-Semite, sure had done a pretty good impersonation of one.

Look at the two celebrity blow-ups together, and maybe throw in Sen. George Allen's "macaca" moment, too. One thing they teach us is that there are no unguarded moments anymore. Richards's outburst was filmed by someone with a tiny digital camera, Allen's by a young man with a video camera. Footage of their indiscretions and facsimiles of Gibson's drunken-driving police report were disseminated to the world within hours via the Internet. You can't even run anymore, much less hide.

The other lesson is that in each case, something ugly erupted from somewhere so deep inside that I'm not sure Richards, Gibson or Allen even knew the ugliness was there.

Richards's heckler just happened to be black. As far as we know -- the video clip begins with the comedian losing it -- there was no racial content in the heckling. But something inside Richards was triggered, some hidden fail-safe switch, and he went immediately to race as if that were the reason the man was annoying him and thus an appropriate way to strike back. He didn't see the heckler as a man, he saw him as a black man -- one who needed to be reminded that once upon a time he might have been lynched for his impertinence, and who needed to be put in his place with the most explosive word in the language.

Gibson's rant about Jews was a similar thing. Allen's fumble was less unforgivable, but then again he's a United States senator, not an actor or a comedian.

Out of nowhere, for no apparent reason, come explosions of vitriol, suspicion and disdain, all aimed at minorities. Don't tell me that racism is dead. It just shuns the light of day.

Saturday, May 5, 2007

Politics For Idiots~ Guantanamo detention camp

so basically what is going on is the American military is tortured and sexually assaulted alleged terrorists.
yes, i do mean alleged as in, if you Google "NLEC" or "No Longer Enemy Combatant" you will find that at least 30 of the prisoners at Guantanamo were never even enemy combatants or terrorist at all.
30 inncocent people taken under American custody, and in direct violation of the agreements at the Geneva Conventions, were abused at terrorized. (no pun intended)
and since they are not american citizen they are beyond the reach of law, therefore habeas corpus does not apply to them

^^^ thats basically it. now to understand it

so how bad was the torture?
well, some NLEC soldiers told NPR they were spit on, denied sleep, a female MP was brought into a room and while they were blinded and gagged, they were told her period blood was being dripped on they. they were hung by the hands from the ceiling naked with bags over their heads (pictures were taken as well). they were forced to break rocks and shackled, and poop in buckets.
worst of all habeas corpus was suspended for them . (habeas corpus is he writ of habeas corpus has historically been an important instrument for the safeguarding of individual freedom against arbitrary state action. Known as the "Great Writ," a writ of habeas corpus is a court order to hear the charges against detainees.without habeas corpus a person can be held indefinitely with out charge) they would never know what charges were brought against them.
if they were guilty, why was there never a trial to prove them so?
they were taken and held and abused with no charges brought against them.
imagine how bad this would feel if you were innocent or "NLEC" having years taken away from your life and tortured for no good reason.
Also the Geneva Conventions which consist of four treaties formulated in Genevea that set the standards for international law for humanitarian concerns. They were signed by the US and specifically ban torture of POW, they should be treated humanely

(there was a very good series on NLEC Guantanamo prisoners on National Public Radio. One man was captured and sent to Guantanamo because his friend was suspected of being a terrorist. He was actually not worried when he was taken by the Americans because he had actually been to Ameriaca several times. He had been to Disney Land, seen the Grand Canyon, ridden the metro in New York, when he heard he was being taken into custody by the Americans he was relieved. until it turned out it would be the worst years of his entire life. its very moving listen.)

AND "Prompted by a Supreme Court ruling banning military tribunals, Congress has empowered President Bush to form commissions to try people who provide "material support" to the enemy. Critics say the new law allows the president to declare U.S. citizens to be enemy combatants. "




The government lies to our face. They did it in Watergate, in the Iran Contra Affair, Vietnam and now Guantanamo, why should we believe them now.(im not an anarchist, anarchy is stupid)


The Irony: "We are detaining these enemy combatants in a humane manner," General Miller told reporters in March 2004. "Should our men or women be held in similar circumstances, I would hope they would be treated in this manner."

i feel sorry for the American soldiers in Iraq then

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Politics For Idiots

so im in highschool, i keep up with current events. unfortunately my peers do not.
so i decided to devote a blog that will analyze and de-construct political events. so young people can understand.
we should all know what is going on around us. we should all be involved. we should all care. because politics does affect you, not matter how small.